Fraud recovery & whistleblower
Turning investor fraud into a recovery thesis
Capital and analytical support for asset recovery, investor fraud and qui tam matters, grounded in public records, fund flow analysis and a clear view of who can pay.
Executive overview
Fraud creates losses that are hard to recover. Assets move, defendants dissipate funds, and victims lack the resources to trace them. The matters that recover value are the ones where responsible parties and collectible assets are identified early.
LOFFCO applies investigative research, forensic accounting and collectability analysis to fraud matters, and finances claims brought by counsel for victims, estates and relators. Our case record includes matters that followed this approach.
| Claim value | $10 million and above in aggregate losses |
|---|---|
| Clients | Counsel for investors, receivers, trustees, relators |
| Capital use | Fees, forensic accounting, asset tracing, enforcement |
| Frameworks | Civil fraud, securities, receivership, False Claims Act and statutory whistleblower programs |
| Recourse | Generally nonrecourse |
What we finance
Matters we review
- Investor fraud and Ponzi-like schemes
- Claims against third parties who enabled a fraud
- Asset tracing and freezing
- Qui tam actions under the False Claims Act
- Matters under statutory whistleblower programs
- Cross-border recovery
Funding structures
Recovery funding
Fees and expenses for claims against defendants and third parties.
Investigation funding
Early capital for fund flow analysis and asset tracing.
Relator support
Case cost funding for qui tam relators and their counsel, where permitted.
Enforcement funding
Capital to domesticate and enforce judgments against located assets.
Underwriting focus
What we test first
The public and documentary record, identification of solvent or insured third parties, the location of traceable assets, and the interaction with any government action.
Industries served
Process timeline
Indicative timeline
Overview
Response within five business daysConfidentiality
Weeks 1 to 2Diligence
Weeks 2 to 6Term sheet
Weeks 4 to 8Funding
At closing
Timing is indicative and depends on complexity and document readiness.
Questions
Frequently asked
Other solutions
Do you fund qui tam matters?
Selectively, where permitted and where the relator is represented by experienced counsel. Structures respect the rules that govern relator shares and the government's role.
Can you fund before a government action is filed?
Yes, in some cases. Early work can strengthen the record, though timing and confidentiality obligations must be managed with counsel.
Who are typical third-party defendants?
Depending on the facts, they can include banks, auditors, administrators, promoters and other parties whose conduct enabled the fraud.
Confidential case review
Start with a nonprivileged overview
Send a short summary of the dispute, the parties and the capital need. We answer every submission within five business days. Substantive materials come later, once a confidentiality framework is in place.